It's just Centos

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Ellsworth [mailto:ellsworth.rob...@gmail.com] 
Sent: September 16, 2014 16:15
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x

SELinux causing the lack of connectivity?

On 9/16/2014 4:13 PM, Jay Tarbox wrote:
> Netstat shows it's listening
>
> [root@asspnew ~]# netstat -l
> Active Internet connections (only servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address         State
> tcp        0      0 10.1.1.97:smtp          0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> tcp        0      0 localhost:smtp          0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:54617           0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:55553           0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:55555           0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:22222           0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Tarbox [mailto:jtar...@necomm.com]
> Sent: September 16, 2014 15:57
> To: For Users of ASSP
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x
>
> And now, I've got nothing on the new server.
> I can't get to a web interface on port 55555 despite the below in the log:
>
> Sep-16-14 15:54:56 [init] Listening for SMTP connections on 
> 10.1.1.97:25
> Sep-16-14 15:54:56 [init] Listening for admin HTTP connections on 
> 0.0.0.0:55555 0.0.0.0:22222
> Sep-16-14 15:54:56 [init] Listening for stat HTTP connections on 
> 0.0.0.0:55553
>
>
> Sometimes I hate Linux so much.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Tarbox [mailto:jtar...@necomm.com]
> Sent: September 16, 2014 14:02
> To: For Users of ASSP
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x
>
> For some reason I thought that ASSP 2 required a DB server.  This is not the 
> case, eh?
> I'm in a company with ~45 employees and processing ~2500 emails/day.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net]
> Sent: September 16, 2014 09:14
> To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x
>
> :: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
> ::
> <sig.2335687692.264015110.783.1410803740460.javamail.zim...@drdos.info> ::
> Doug Lytle <supp...@drdos.info> wrote:
>
>>>> Should I upgrade inplace or load up a new server (virtual)?
>> If you'd like a quick way to revert, then I'd roll a new VM.
> agreed; setup a new, clean VM, install the needed prerequisites then 
> proceed setting up Perl and then ASSP, check if all the needed stuff 
> is ok and loaded, next, done that and using your v1 config, proceed 
> configuring your v2 to match your v1, if needed copy whatever config 
> file (domains, regexp...) to your v2 and ensure the v2 will load it; 
> once done, copy your spam/notspam/errors folders from v1 to v2 and run 
> a rebuild, at that point you should be ready to switch VMs and try 
> using your v2 ... and if it doesn't work, rolling back will be easy
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to