1. set 'spfeValencePB' back to the default value '5' or better to '0' - 
what was the idea behind to set it to 60 ?
2. the domain 'pacificlightingsystems.com' publishes two SPF-V1 records 
(IMHO this is wrong) - the sending IP 173.160.199.113 matches the second 
entry
3. check your setup - assp is reporting [UnknownLocalSender] for the 
domain  'pacificlightingsystems.com' 

exclude this domain from SPF
or override the spf-record for this domain to

v=spf1 mx a:glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com 
a:spotlight.pacificlightingsystems.com ~all

or better

v=spf1 ip4:173.160.199.113/32 ip4:173.160.199.114/32 ~all

or even better

v=spf1 ip4:173.160.199.113/32 ip4:173.160.199.114/32 -all

Thomas





Von:    Tim Evans <tev...@sparling.com>
An:     For Users of ASSP <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  19.09.2014 16:38
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF Failures



Here are two. There have been others, but we do a lot of business with 
this company so this is one I easily remember. I can get more if that 
would help.

Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> info: found message size announcement: 
19.07 kByte
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [UnknownLocalSender] 
173.160.199.113 <us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> [scoring] (Invalid 
Local Sender 'us...@pacificlightingsystems.com')
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> Message-Score: added 20 (flValencePB) 
for InvalidLocalSender, total score for this message is now 20
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> PB-IP-Score for '173.160.199.113' is 
20, added 20 for InvalidLocalSender
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [Noprocessing] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com info: found 
valid MSGID signature in [In-Reply-To:] - accept mail
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com Message-ID 
found: 
E9BF03AF02EC99458623BCBAD7395EC8483A5CE7@glaze.PacificLightingSystems.local
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [scoring] SPF: 
permerror ip=173.160.199.113 mailfrom=us...@pacificlightingsystems.com 
helo=glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com Message-Score: 
added 40 (spfeValencePB)for SPF permerror, total score for this message is 
now 60
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] [MessageLimit] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [spam found] 
(MessageScore 60, limit 45) [RE Amazon Controls mock up] -> 
c:/assp/discarded/3566--929914.eml;
Sep-17-14 10:07:02 73622-03566 [Worker_2] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [SMTP Error] 554 
5.7.1 Mail appears to be unsolicited -- send error reports to 
thisisnts...@sparling.com


Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightngsystems.com> info: found message size announcement: 
9.19 kByte
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [UnknownLocalSender] 
173.160.199.113 <us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> [scoring] (Invalid 
Local Sender 'us...@pacificlightingsystems.com')
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> Message-Score: added 20 (flValencePB) 
for InvalidLocalSender, total score for this message is now 20
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [Noprocessing] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com info: found 
valid MSGID signature in [References:] - accept mail
Sep-17-14 09:23:47 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com Message-ID 
found: 
6C9BBD35E9796F45B1D52894183874A547903C6E@glaze.PacificLightingSystems.local
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [scoring] SPF: 
permerror ip=173.160.199.113 mailfrom=us...@pacificlightingsystems.com 
helo=glaze.pacificlightingsystems.com
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com Message-Score: 
added 40 (spfeValencePB) for SPF permerror, total score for this message 
is now 60
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] [MessageLimit] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [spam found] 
(MessageScore 60, limit 45) [RE Cooper Monaco Fixture Warranty] -> 
c:/assp/discarded/6894--929669.eml;
Sep-17-14 09:23:48 71027-06894 [Worker_4] 173.160.199.113 
<us...@pacificlightingsystems.com> to: us...@sparling.com [SMTP Error] 554 
5.7.1 Mail appears to be unsolicited -- send error reports to 
thisisnts...@sparling.com

...Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 12:07 AM
To: For Users of ASSP
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF Failures

>I'm seeing a lot of SPF failures recently,

show the loglines

Thomas





Von:    Tim Evans <tev...@sparling.com>
An:     "assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net" 
<assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  18.09.2014 21:24
Betreff:        [Assp-user] SPF Failures



I'm seeing a lot of SPF failures recently, and investigating the details I 

find some are incorrect - the email comes from a valid system listed in 
the SPF record. Has anyone else seen anything like this or have any ideas 
what the problem may be?

I'm running assp 2.4.3(14258) on perl v5.16.3 and Windows Server 
2008R2SP1. I've got Mail::SPF v2.007 and Mail::SPF::Query v1.999001, which 

both look like the current recommended modules.

...Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user





DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 


individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user





DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to