On 17 June 2013 16:58, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17 June 2013 16:55, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15 August 2012 20:10, ольга крыжановская <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Glenn, I have attached a patch which makes the directory fd to the >>> current working directory available as Shbltin_t* context->pwdfd, so >>> that builtins like ls, grep, find, mv, cp and so on can use it in the >>> future for openat(). >> >> lost patch which never made it >> >> Seriously, is there a more reliable way to submit patches? > > forgot to comment on the purpose: I agree with Lionel (per comment in > http://lists.research.att.com/pipermail/ast-developers/2013q2/002702.html) > that builtins (grep, find, ...) which do directory traversal should be > able to benefit from the directory fd maintained by ksh93 internally.
Can this patch - now that ast-@(ksh|open).2013-06-28 has an at API emulation integrated - be merged with AST/UWIN trunk, please? Or at least state a justification for its rejection. Its rotting since a year now. A whole year! Ced -- Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> Institute Pasteur _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
