On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17 June 2013 16:58, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 17 June 2013 16:55, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 15 August 2012 20:10, ольга крыжановская <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Glenn, I have attached a patch which makes the directory fd to the >>>> current working directory available as Shbltin_t* context->pwdfd, so >>>> that builtins like ls, grep, find, mv, cp and so on can use it in the >>>> future for openat(). >>> >>> lost patch which never made it >>> >>> Seriously, is there a more reliable way to submit patches? >> >> forgot to comment on the purpose: I agree with Lionel (per comment in >> http://lists.research.att.com/pipermail/ast-developers/2013q2/002702.html) >> that builtins (grep, find, ...) which do directory traversal should be >> able to benefit from the directory fd maintained by ksh93 internally. > > Can this patch - now that ast-@(ksh|open).2013-06-28 has an at API > emulation integrated - be merged with AST/UWIN trunk, please? Or at > least state a justification for its rejection. > > Its rotting since a year now. A whole year!
;-(( Erm... grumpf... ;-(( ... I'll talk to David... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
