On 30 August 2013 05:11, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 19:45, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> the AT&T Software Technology ast alpha 2013-08-29 source release
>> has been posted to the download site
>>         http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/
>> the package names and md5 checksums are
>>             INIT  132e0403af573fa1cb1e202267fedeb8
>>         ast-open  334615fb3a652575106194c281d27b5c
>>          ast-ksh  ebcc56d9ab673aaafbb163d6eee1a93c
>> the md5 sums should match the ones listed on the download page
>>
>> this is still a work in progress, but we are getting closer to a beta
>> we are interested in verification that new features work
>> and at this point not interested in quibbles about naming
>> once the underlying features work then naming discussions can commence
>>
>> a big chunk of time was spent porting to the various combinations of
>>         architectures X os X compilers X build options
>> a lot of it due to differing levels of support for the *at() syscalls
>> which then kicked in different parts of the -last emulation code
>>
>> with adoption of *at() file descriptor leaks pop up all over the place
>> to see how bad *at() coverage is on different os/release combinations compare
>>         $INSTALLROOT/src/lib/libast/FEATURE/atdev
>> produced by
>>         $PACKAGEROOT/src/lib/libast/features/atdev.c
>> on different os/release combinations
>>
>> one file descriptor leak in 3d+ksh brought down the entire build system
>> it took a day to figure everything out and recover, including code checkins
>> that sometimes did the opposite (keep old drop new)
>> so once again there is no such thing as a simple patch
>>
>> don't use this alpha on linux.ia64 -- looks like *at() problems are lurking 
>> there
>>
>> look for ast runtime debugging tips in a separate message
>>
>> changes since 2013-08-14
>
> Another bug (still trying to calm down over the cd -@ disaster):

Would you quit whining, please? I think we got the picture

Lionel
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to