patches not forgotten just trying to get to a stable state as you can see we're not there
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:07:14 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > the AT&T Software Technology ast alpha 2013-09-26 source release > > has been posted to the download site > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/ > > the package names and md5 checksums are > > INIT 95da0c907a6ed25a601c373e16a1862e > > ast-base 0aed6c2cd6bccf0ec23120179a1dfc38 > > ast-open 529b4c33049de4100bc6f5ecaafa7722 > > ast-ksh d0762a194fe508641fa0706294236d3f > > the md5 sums should match the ones listed on the download page > > > > note that these are binary md5sums :) > [snip] > Erm... there are a couple of problems: > 1. ast-ksh doesn't build on Solaris 11/AMD64/64bit: > -- snip -- > + cc -KPIC -D_TS_ERRNO -D_REENTRANT -KPIC -g -xs -xspace -Xa > -xstrconst -z combreloc -xildoff -xcsi '-errtags=yes' > '-DSHOPT_CMDLIB_BLTIN=0' '-DSH_CMDLIB_DIR="/usr/ast/bin"' '-DSHO > PT_CMDLIB_HDR="/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/tmp_solaris_builtin_header.h"' > -DSHOPT_SYSRC '-D_map_libc=1' '-D_lib_socket=1' -lsocket -lnsl -I. > -I/hom > e/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum > -I/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/arch/sol11.i386-64/include/ast > -D_PACKAGE_ast > -c > /home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c > "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", > line 198: undefined symbol: sha384_scale > "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", > line 198: non-constant initializer: op "NAME" > "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", > line 267: warning: statement not reached (E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED) > cc: acomp failed for > /home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c > mamake [lib/libsum]: *** exit code 2 making sumlib.o > -- snip -- sum-sha2.c has #define sha384_scale 0 sumlib.c has #include "sum-sha2.c" #undef METHOD #define METHOD(x) x##_match,x##_description,x##_options,x##_open,x##_init,x##_block,x##_data,x##_print,x##_done,x##_scale,x##_flags METHOD(sha384), you'll have to track down why for that particular cc and options x##_scale => sha384_scale doesn't expand to 0 give that a few other METHOD() expansions in that file also had 0 scale and went through fine also, but unrelated, '-D_lib_socket=1' -lsocket -lnsl in cc options is a concern those should have been handled by the build _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
