On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Roland Mainz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:07:14 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > the AT&T Software Technology ast alpha 2013-09-26 source release >>> > has been posted to the download site >>> > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/ >>> > the package names and md5 checksums are >>> > INIT 95da0c907a6ed25a601c373e16a1862e >>> > ast-base 0aed6c2cd6bccf0ec23120179a1dfc38 >>> > ast-open 529b4c33049de4100bc6f5ecaafa7722 >>> > ast-ksh d0762a194fe508641fa0706294236d3f >>> > the md5 sums should match the ones listed on the download page >>> > >>> > note that these are binary md5sums :) >>> [snip] >> >>> Erm... there are a couple of problems: >>> 1. ast-ksh doesn't build on Solaris 11/AMD64/64bit: >>> -- snip -- >>> + cc -KPIC -D_TS_ERRNO -D_REENTRANT -KPIC -g -xs -xspace -Xa >>> -xstrconst -z combreloc -xildoff -xcsi '-errtags=yes' >>> '-DSHOPT_CMDLIB_BLTIN=0' '-DSH_CMDLIB_DIR="/usr/ast/bin"' '-DSHO >>> PT_CMDLIB_HDR="/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/tmp_solaris_builtin_header.h"' >>> -DSHOPT_SYSRC '-D_map_libc=1' '-D_lib_socket=1' -lsocket -lnsl -I. >>> -I/hom >>> e/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum >>> -I/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/arch/sol11.i386-64/include/ast >>> -D_PACKAGE_ast >>> -c >>> /home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c >>> "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", >>> line 198: undefined symbol: sha384_scale >>> "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", >>> line 198: non-constant initializer: op "NAME" >>> "/home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c", >>> line 267: warning: statement not reached (E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED) >>> cc: acomp failed for >>> /home/test001/ksh93/ast_ksh_20130926/build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sumlib.c >>> mamake [lib/libsum]: *** exit code 2 making sumlib.o >>> -- snip -- > [snip] >> >> patches not forgotten >> just trying to get to a stable state > > Oh please... I hereby swear to eat 2 inches of a broomstick if the > getconf table changes cause any trouble... :-) > >> as you can see we're not there > > Grumpf... I'd prefer the "stuff all patches in"-approach as it gives > me the opportunity to fix more stuf... :-) > >> sum-sha2.c has >> #define sha384_scale 0 >> sumlib.c has >> #include "sum-sha2.c" >> #undef METHOD >> #define METHOD(x) >> x##_match,x##_description,x##_options,x##_open,x##_init,x##_block,x##_data,x##_print,x##_done,x##_scale,x##_flags >> METHOD(sha384), >> >> you'll have to track down why for that particular cc and options >> x##_scale => sha384_scale doesn't expand to 0 > > Erm... because it uses the libmd codepath ?
This patch should fix the issue: -- snip -- diff -r -u original/src/lib/libsum/sum-lmd.c build_i386_64bit_debug/src/lib/libsum/sum-lmd.c --- src/lib/libsum/sum-lmd.c 2013-09-25 16:48:46.000000000 +0200 +++ src/lib/libsum/sum-lmd.c 2013-09-26 23:48:14.224181544 +0200 @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ #define sha384_description "FIPS 180-2 SHA384 secure hash algorithm. The block count is not printed." #define sha384_options "[+(version)?sha384 (solaris -lmd) 2005-07-26]" #define sha384_match "sha384|sha-384|SHA384|SHA-384" +#define sha384_scale 0 #define sha384_flags SUM_INDICATOR #define sha384_init lmd_init #define sha384_block lmd_block -- snip -- Still missing are the single command wrappers to get the digest part of the utilities in sync with busybox and GNU coreutils, e.g. we need: -- snip -- sha1sum(1) sha2sum(1) sha128sum(1) sha224sum(1) sha256sum(1) sha384sum(1) sha512sum(1) -- snip -- sha224sum(1) is likely the largest effort... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
