re clang -- yes -- last Fall we were in the process of getting the build to please clang my biggest hurdle is signed vs unsigned mismatches
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bob Krzaczek <k...@cis.rit.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:37:00AM -0400, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > thanks for looking into this > > the ast build farm decomissioned its last freebsd machine over a year ago > > at first glance the iffe changes look good > > the patches will be rolled in the next few weeks > > That's great; I'm glad to have been some help, Glenn! For what it's > worth, since those patches were sent, I've found they also seem to > work unchanged on FreeBSD 10.0 (amd64) as well, where they've switched > from gcc to clang as the default system compiler. clang certainly is a > whiny compiler :-) but despite all the warnings, everything did build > and seems to be running. > > Best, > Bob > > > -- > Bob Krzaczek, Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, RIT > phone +1-585-4757196, email k...@cis.rit.edu, icbm 43.08586N 77.67744W >
_______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@lists.research.att.com http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
