----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eleftherios Koutsofios" <e...@research.att.com> > To: ast-developers@lists.research.att.com > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 3:47:52 PM > Subject: Re: [ast-developers] building ksh93 on macOS using clang/LLVM > > hi, > > if the plan is to reduce this repo to just enough to build ksh93, > I think it should be moved to a separate repo, since this is supposed to be > all of AST. > I don't know if anyone still uses the whole thing but I'd rather keep it > whole.
What is the reason for it ? I would not want to keep the code copied over to several places. As a reference to full code, you can branch out or tag your last commit in beta branch. But I am not sure how many people will be willing to maintain it. > > Glenn and Dave used to package up ksh93 and just the libs needed to build it, > I can put that up as /att/ksh93 if there's interest. it's from 2013, like the > master branch of AST. > > the biggest issue I have with building AST isn't so much the legacy code, but > the header file incompatibilities, and these arise from AST trying to > replace system libraries with better versions. > at some point I had built AST with clang on linux but not on OSX and it had > to do > with the different headers in OSX. > > thanks > > lefteris > > On 10/24/17 00:16, Kurtis Rader wrote: > > -- > E. Koutsofios > AT&T Labs - Research > > _______________________________________________ > ast-developers mailing list > ast-developers@lists.research.att.com > http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers > -- -- Siteshwar Vashisht _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@lists.research.att.com http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
