----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Frontz" <jeff.fro...@gmail.com>
> To: "ADAM EDGAR" <ae1...@att.com>
> Cc: ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 5:09:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [ast-developers] building ksh93 on macOS using clang/LLVM
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM, EDGAR, ADAM < ae1...@att.com > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I don’t know why a second build process that only builds what is needed for
> ksh can not be added to the existing source tree.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I agree, that sounds fine -- but what I thought I'd been seeing was an effort
> to strip things out of ksh or otherwise cause a divergence from what would
> compile in the stock AST environment. Maybe I'm misreading/misunderstanding
> all of the github traffic/comments?

You have been reading the comments correctly and it's unlikely it would be done 
without breaking the current build process.

> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ast-developers mailing list
> ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
> http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
> 

-- 
--
Siteshwar Vashisht
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to