On 05/ 2/12 06:39 PM, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
FYI, the correct package is ast-open, not ast-base, and just send your
patches to [email protected] :)
Irek
I'll get the patches cleaned up and sorted, but I have to admit to being
a little confused by ast-open:
From the Website:
*PACKAGE NAME* * DESCRIPTION*
{/ast-make
<http://www2.research.att.com/%7Egsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ast-make>
ast-ksh
<http://www2.research.att.com/%7Egsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ast-ksh>
ksh
<http://www2.research.att.com/%7Egsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ksh>
ast-ast
<http://www2.research.att.com/%7Egsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ast-ast>
/} ast-base
<http://www2.research.att.com/%7Egsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ast-base>
- ksh, ksh builtin commands, pax, nmake, tw, sfio, and ast libraries
is ast-base just the outside world name of the package?
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
