Hi,

Currently I'm using Version JM 93t+ 2009-05-01, built on NetBSD 5.0.
Since there was recently talk about NetBSD here on the list, I thought
I'd update my ksh93.

I've successfully built ast-ksh on various versions of NetBSD.  However,
building now fails on 5.1; here are the beginning and the end from
make.out:

  package: make start at Thu Mar 18 21:42:40 CET 2010 in 
/home/mxp/tmp/build/ast/again/arch/netbsd.i386
  execname not specified in AUX vector: No such file or directory
  make: warning: cc: C probe failed -- default assumed
  cmd/INIT:
  execname not specified in AUX vector: No such file or directory
  make [cmd/INIT]: warning: cc: C probe failed -- default assumed

  [...]

  + ignore cp /home/mxp/tmp/build/ast/again/src/cmd/ksh93/fun/pushd 
/home/mxp/tmp/build/ast/again/arch/netbsd.i386/fun/pushd
  + chmod ugo+x /home/mxp/tmp/build/ast/again/arch/netbsd.i386/fun/pushd
  make [cmd/ksh93]: *** 4 actions failed
  make: *** exit code 1 making cmd/ksh93
  lib:
  execname not specified in AUX vector: No such file or directory
  make [lib]: warning: cc: C probe failed -- default assumed
  cmd:
  execname not specified in AUX vector: No such file or directory
  make [cmd]: warning: cc: C probe failed -- default assumed
  make: *** 5 actions failed
  package: make done  at Thu Mar 18 21:46:20 CET 2010 in 
/home/mxp/tmp/build/ast/again/arch/netbsd.i386

I had problems with "execname not specified in AUX vector: No such file
or directory" earlier when *running* ksh93 scripts.  I asked about this
on the NetBSD mailing list and I was told to enable some code in the
kernel, which did indeed fix the problem.  However it doesn't seem to
help here.

Apparently the problem is an incomplete implementation of $ORIGIN on
NetBSD.  Is there any way to build ast-ksh without $ORIGIN?

Thanks and best regards

-- 
Dr.-Ing. Michael Piotrowski, M.A.                   <[email protected]>
Public key at <http://www.dynalabs.de/mxp/pubkey.txt> (ID 0x1614A044)
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users

Reply via email to