On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Oliver Kiddle <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for fixing the previous issues. > I still get one complaint from the Debian lintian tool for the ksh man > page. For line 7, it complains that the xx macro is undefined. > > If you're interested, Debian bug reports are at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ksh > The proper procedure is for me to verify them and forward them but I've > not been able to reproduce them. That is except for the one complaining > that printf treating field widths as characters instead of bytes as > prescribed by POSIX. My own opinion is that treating them as characters > is much more useful and it'd be a pity to "fix" it to use bytes.
AFAIK you can use %Ls instead of %s if you want characters instead of bytes. > > Of the Ubuntu bugs, you should look at: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/218837 > Essentially, line 1035 of src/cmd/ksh93/sh/name.c looks dodgy - was > `if(np=nq)' intended to be a comparison? This is an assignment. Replacing it with np==nq breaks the ksh93 test suite. Olga -- , _ _ , { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } .----'-/`-/ [email protected] \-`\-'----. `'-..-| / Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer \ |-..-'` /\/\ /\/\ `--` `--` _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
