Glenn, it may be helpful to document %Ls and %Lc in the printf(1) built in manual page.
Olga On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:22:49 +0100 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Oliver Kiddle <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thanks for fixing the previous issues. >> > I still get one complaint from the Debian lintian tool for the ksh man >> > page. For line 7, it complains that the xx macro is undefined. >> > >> > If you're interested, Debian bug reports are at >> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=ksh >> > The proper procedure is for me to verify them and forward them but I've >> > not been able to reproduce them. That is except for the one complaining >> > that printf treating field widths as characters instead of bytes as >> > prescribed by POSIX. My own opinion is that treating them as characters >> > is much more useful and it'd be a pity to "fix" it to use bytes. > >> AFAIK you can use %Ls instead of %s if you want characters instead of bytes. > > yes, and %Lc for single characters -- , _ _ , { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } .----'-/`-/ [email protected] \-`\-'----. `'-..-| / Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer \ |-..-'` /\/\ /\/\ `--` `--` _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
