On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 08:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: > > > Yeah that is why AT&T filed in montana in 2004 to get qwests changed > > from 4 cents to something lower (but still over 2 cents). Why in > > nebraska it can be over 14 cents a minute for local (largely structured > > to screw qwest). Why iowa I believe has no caps on it and SBC signs > > agreements saying "you cant charge more than we do" and stupid CLECs > > agree and dont read that clause (nor do their lawyers) and when they > > wanted 4 cents a minute they only get 2 cents and it works out to a huge > > difference to them later on (one specific 2005 case was $200k for one > > month difference). > You are on crack.
So are the many rural phone companies that get 70% of their operating revenue from access charges. Dont believe me google it. Everything I stated (cept the case with SBC over 'you cant charge more than we do') is public. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
