trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: >On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 10:05 +0100, Ron Arts wrote: > > >>Well, IANAL but I think this has not been tested in court, and there >>is no way you can be sure you can get away with it. >>Being devil's advocate I could make a case this is just plain fraud. >> >> > >I dont think forking the code is fraud and any claim they have that it >is, when it was *them* that chose to release under the gpl which >specifically allows forks to occur would be very questionable. > >I wouldnt want to be the test case either, however if they dont like the >gpl they shouldnt have picked it. How can they in all honesty sue >postgress for a gpl violation and then say the gpl doesnt apply to the >very same code when they are on the other side of the fence? > > > It's in the debian distro. I believe debian is the distro that is most attentive to license issues. They are the ones who leave out the "free" MOH that comes with asterisk because they don't believe it's really free. If there were serious doubts about mysql it would not be in the debian main section. It would be in non-free.
I have mysql 5 packages built for debian stable(aka sarge) on sale today. $0 per machine plus $0 per user licensing :) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
