Chris Mason (Lists) wrote: > perfect example... > <trimmed to reduce eyestrain and carpal tunnel>
> Paul wrote: > >>The silver lining could be there for innovative smaller providers. They >>can sell vpn-tunneled service to those who are on ISP's that play games. >>You don't need to use strong encryption. No ISP wants to be decrypting >>customer traffic even if it is easily done. Blocking VPN would also be a >>foolish thing to do. They don't want the lowest priced plans to start >>resembling things like webtv. >> >> Suppose we take a new router that can be reflashed with linux kernel and add the tunneling capability. That should work fine for customer premises. I believe they can be bought new for under $60. We want efficient tunneling and minimal encryption. If I send an email encrypted with a decoder ring I got in my breakfast cereal, it is easily breakable. If I can show that anybody intercepeted that email and decoded it, I might be proving their actions are willful and deliberate. I believe the same legal principal would deter ISP's from analyzing the tunnel contents. The provider should be able to handle lots of these vpn tunnels per linux server. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
