On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 01:10 -0600, Mark wrote: > I doubt that! See how you "own" the DID when a shifty seller drops out > of DIDx! DIDx does not protect the buyer when a seller leaves the DIDx > syste. > they claim they do in their faq, where if it doesnt work for the month due to that you get a refund or something. I recall a post from linda I think on that not that long ago.
Most carriers can change your did at will, broadvoice for example changed someones tollfree for no aparent reason, information of that was posted to this list about the same time as the comments on their faq, maybe a month ago. > attempting to use scare tactics against me for excercising my rights of > free speech based solely on the facts of my experience with their you should reread the constitution, you dont have an absolute right to speech in america, private entities can curtail that freely, think of a movie theater where you can be removed if you talk during the movie. Then there are other limitations, such as you cant yell 'fire' in a crowded theater, etc. The first amendment is a limitation on the government not a priviledge granted to you, its a symantic difference but one that need to be understood if you want to understand the meaning and intent of the amendment. And lastly something that most people dont seem to understand is that a right to speech doesnt guarantee a right to be heard. > organization. This "notice" was served via email which I do not believe > is a valid form for serving a legal notice in any US State, although I > am not an attorney, so I may be wrong. > It is providing it is delivered to the correct person. You can obviously try to challenge it as 'defective service' but by doing that you admit that you infact got it. But its too late to try to say that you didnt get it now, your post that you were infact served is now archived all over the net :) assuming it was actually service and not just a more informal notice. To prove this is accepted by the courts, well sorta (I dont recall the exact cite, but google does have it indexed somewhere) a lawyer challenged notice in court saying the email was lost (he didnt appear in the first place) - he wasnt saying it wasnt sent, because he cant prove that, only saying that he never received it - something no one else can prove under normal circumstances. This was last summer iirc. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
