I haven't installed FreeBSD 4.X since 5.3 came out but I have heard from some of my geek buddies that 4.11 is still faster on uniprocessor machines than 5.x or even 6.x. Personally, I love 6.x and I really see no benefit to using 4.x even on single processor boxes.
Tj -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Culhan Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:27 AM To: Asterisk on BSD discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] howto install asterisk on freebsd release 4.11 On Thu, August 24, 2006 03:34, Dmitriy Yermakov wrote: > mansour safai wrote: >> Hi There, >> >> >> Is there anybody who installed asterisk on freebsd >> 4.11 release ? >> I was not succesful. please guide me. >> I updated the ports and I installed the lib using >> ports but when I try to install zaptel it says cannot load it for release >> before than 5 I couldn't install the asterisk from ports also >> because it ask for zaptel. I don't need zaptel because I will not use >> hardware by asterisk. >> > > make -DWITHOUT_ZAPTEL install What is a compelling reason to use 4.11 rather than 6.x ? -kim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
