I agree completely. 6.1 is a big win in a lot of ways.
There are special cases where 4.11 performs far better on uniprocessors, and no doubt it will live on as a vintage release for quite some time because it's still going to be popular with ISPs and ASPs. Same thing happened with the 2.6 branch. Yahoo kept running it till buying compatible hardware became difficult. So even though I personally find 6.1 better in general, we should keep in mind that there will still be people for whom asterisk support on 4.11 will be quite valuable, for things like higher hosting density or embedded appliance performance, for example. Cheers, Rich Ninneman, Tj wrote:
I haven't installed FreeBSD 4.X since 5.3 came out but I have heard from some of my geek buddies that 4.11 is still faster on uniprocessor machines than 5.x or even 6.x. Personally, I love 6.x and I really see no benefit to using 4.x even on single processor boxes. Tj
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
