Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote: > My only comment is that using "extension" to refer to an entry in the > current sip.conf is insane. SIP devices are not extensions. They are > devices which may or may not have more than one entry in sip.conf (one > for each "line"/call appearance). Perhaps <sip_account>.conf would be a > better term.
Agreed "extension" was a poor choice. We are actually thinking in terms of devices, but had not considered multiple appearance devices. Perhaps <account>.conf (since we are placing them in a sip directory) or <sip_account>.conf (as suggested) would be more accurate. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
