Alejandro Kauffmann wrote:
Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
My only comment is that using "extension" to refer to an entry in the
current sip.conf is insane. SIP devices are not extensions. They are
devices which may or may not have more than one entry in sip.conf (one
for each "line"/call appearance). Perhaps <sip_account>.conf would be a
better term.
Agreed "extension" was a poor choice. We are actually thinking in terms of
devices, but had not considered
multiple appearance devices. Perhaps <account>.conf (since we are placing
them in a sip directory) or <sip_account>.conf (as suggested) would be more
accurate.
We use the MAC address as the SIP User ID. For example the Polycom IP
50x have 3 call appearances. We register each line as a separate SIP
user ID. First line MAC-a, second line MAC-b, etc. This helps to
prevent anyone from thinking a device is an extension.
--
Now accepting new clients in Birmingham, Atlanta, Huntsville,
Chattanooga, and Montgomery.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
