On Thursday 28 December 2006 07:14, Jonathan k. Creasy wrote: > Tony Mountifield wrote: > > Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > > On Wednesday 27 December 2006 07:46, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > > Some of my suggestions are also in the waiting queue that can be > > > > seen in the bug/feature request tracker. > > > > > > It is a bugtracker only. Feature requests properly belong on the > > > Wiki, not on the bugtracker. > > > > Despite the bug tracker having a project called "Feature Requests" and > > a report severity called "feature"? > > > > Also, in the bug guidelines, under "So, what is the purpose of the > > bugtracker?", it says "The secondary use is to track feature requests, > > which are not as critical as bugs and which will receive second > > priority in all cases." > > > > If this policy has changed (and I'm not at all convinced it should), > > then the guidelines ought to reflect this. > > I am 100% against changing that policy if anyone is thinking of doing > so. The best way to see, test, document and discuss new features is in > the tracker. Removing new feature requests/features from this system > would put an artificial limit on the community.
The policy has already been in place for some time. However, I want to point out the difference between a feature request, in which no code is uploaded and a feature, in which prospective code is uploaded to the bug. Features (with code) absolutely belong in the bugtracker and will continue to be there for the foreseeable future. Requests (without code) should be added to the bounty page on the Wiki. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
