Features with patches, however, do properly exist in the bugtracker, as they
are prospective additions, not pie-in-the-sky proposals for new functionality.
I imagine that there are useful suggestions that need more time than you
might expect to gain popularity and acceptance.
Proposals for new functionality (without patches) are properly discussed on
this list.
This results in maintenance of two information channels.
That is the only way to ensure that all developers have a chance
to notice and contribute to the discussion.
No, not from a technical viewpoint. It depends on which system gets the
focus and critical mass of attention.
A mailing list can become overloaded. How many traffic can the readers
cope with? Additional tools help to filter and follow only the
interesting topics from various discussions.
It is otherwise very easy to miss a discussion on the bugtracker.
I see this opinion as a matter of taste which software is seen as
appropriate for efficient communication.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_tracking_systems
Software like Mantis or SourceForge trackers provides notifications for
updated items.
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
