----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/#review12596 -----------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure I understand the problem for your issue description: "When ast_format_cap_append was replaced with ast_format_cap_append_from_cap, the behavior of the original function was not preserved. This change introduces ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap which reproduces the original behavior of ast_format_cap_append and alters the original users of ast_format_cap_append to use ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap." What behavioural difference was changed? Why do we need to switch it back? What is the intent of ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap? And why wouldn't you just use ast_format_cap_get_compatible? - Matt Jordan On July 12, 2014, 9:19 p.m., opticron wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 12, 2014, 9:19 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers, Corey Farrell and Matt Jordan. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > When ast_format_cap_append was replaced with ast_format_cap_append_from_cap, > the behavior of the original function was not preserved. This change > introduces ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap which reproduces the > original behavior of ast_format_cap_append and alters the original users of > ast_format_cap_append to use ast_format_cap_append_compatible_from_cap. > > The primary difference in behavior is that ast_format_cap_append_from_cap > appends unconditionally from the source format capability while > ast_format_cap_append checks for compatibility with > ast_format_cap_iscompatible. > > > Diffs > ----- > > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/res/res_pjsip_session.c 418441 > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c 418441 > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/main/format_cap.c 418441 > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/include/asterisk/format_cap.h > 418441 > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 418441 > team/group/media_formats-reviewed-trunk/addons/chan_ooh323.c 418441 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3763/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ensured that calling a channel via Dial() produced the same behavior as trunk. > > > Thanks, > > opticron > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
