----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/#review12844 -----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/res/res_pjsip_notify.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/#comment23185> Document in here that if an arbitrary URI is used the default outbound endpoint will be used, and that it is required. /trunk/res/res_pjsip_notify.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/#comment23186> Rephrase this error. "You must use one or the other." - Joshua Colp On July 21, 2014, 5:23 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 21, 2014, 5:23 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and Mark Michelson. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Example: > > Action: PJSIPNotify > URI: sip:10.10.10.10 > > pjsip send notify uri <type> uri <uri> [uri...] > > > Adds the ability to use URIs with the PJSIP notify commands instead of > endpoints. These mostly work the same as the endpoint notifications. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /trunk/res/res_pjsip_notify.c 419109 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3817/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Used existing endpoint notification and compared it to similar notifies done > against URIs. The outgoing messages looked the same as far as the details I > was concerned with went. > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Rose > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
