-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4040/#review13439
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Minor nits.


branches/12/main/manager.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4040/#comment23971>

    Isn't there a standard ActionID reference that should be used here?  Like 
what is used a few lines above?



branches/12/main/manager.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4040/#comment23970>

    Please declare one variable at a time:
    int a;
    int b;
    ...


- rmudgett


On Oct. 1, 2014, 2:54 p.m., opticron wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4040/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 1, 2014, 2:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-24262
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24262
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This corrects some issues introduced in the responses to the CoreShowChannels 
> AMI command as well as adding documentation for the responses. The command in 
> Asterisk 12 was missing the following fields: Duration, Application, 
> ApplicationData, and BridgedChannel and BridgedUniqueID (replaced with 
> BridgeId).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   branches/12/main/manager.c 424263 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4040/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified that the missing functionality was restored.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> opticron
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to