Yes indeed I have two static IP. One for the first gateway (the main) e one for the second gateway.
I'm not trying to solve a my problem, but trying to explain the usefulness of a new asterisk feature: dynamic autoresolve of external IP address. It is useful for dynamic IP and/or for multiwan failover configuration. thanks On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Nabeel <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you get a static public IP from your ISP? I think that may solve part > of your problem. > > On 23 Oct 2016 9:55 p.m., "Francesco Pasqualini" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I have asterisk in DMZ with private IP. >> The firewall is pfsense with two WAN gateway in failover mode >> >> https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi-WAN#Failover >> >> >> I want to avoid the need to use a script to reconfigure asterisk in the >> event of external IP change (for example if the main gateway go down) >> >> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2012-Februa >> ry/270057.html >> >> >> >> thanks >> >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Guido Falsi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/23/16 11:58, Francesco Pasqualini wrote: >>> > OK interresting. >>> > >>> > Is there a recipe to configure asterisk behind NAT with two WAN >>> failover ? >>> > >>> >>> I know no recipe, since WAN failover means your IP is moved on to the >>> standby connection when links are switched. If this is not the case what >>> you have isn't really a WAN failover, but just two unrelated internet >>> connections and a router balancing them with a failover logic. >>> >>> If the IP changes when the WAN link is switched there is no way the >>> router, or asterisk or anything in your LAN can do to bring over >>> existing connections. >>> >>> Asterisk using ICE will analyze the active connection at call time and >>> insert SDP information pertinent to that one for the call. So it will >>> work correctly for whatever link is being used as long as it is used. >>> Active calls when the link is switched due to a failure on the main one >>> will go mute and time out. >>> >>> As Joshua Colp stated, ICE needs the other party to also have ICE >>> enabled to work correctly, so you also need collaboration from the other >>> side of the communication. >>> >>> Maybe if you explain better what you have and what you are trying to >>> achieve some better suggestion can be given. >>> >>> -- >>> Guido Falsi <[email protected]> >>> >>> -- >>> _____________________________________________________________________ >>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- >>> >>> asterisk-dev mailing list >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev >>> >> >> >> -- >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- >> >> asterisk-dev mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev >> > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-dev mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
