On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:02:16AM -0500, Matt Fredrickson wrote: >> In the time in which I worked with DAHDI extensively, I don't think I >> ever used that feature. > > So I guess there are no objections to remove it. This is now early in > the development cycle, so it is a good time. If that feature had any use > I would call to deprecate it first. But I'm not aware of any use for it. > > Anybody mind removing a few lines from chan_dahdi.c ?
I don't have a problem with it, but you should probably still put something in UPGRADE.txt (as per Josh Colp's comments) to ensure that your back is covered when you do remove them. -- Matthew Fredrickson Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev