On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:54:32PM -0500, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> Warning: bike shedding.
>
> On several code reviews, comments have been left along with a -1 on
> the review - indicating that it is not acceptable for merging - due to
> line length restrictions. While this is technically correct per our
> coding guidelines, it doesn't always result in the most readable code.
>
> Personally, I find this:
>
> if (a_good_variable_name->another_good_name &&
> do_something_to_it(a_good_variable_name->another_good_name)) {
> // Do things
> }
>
> To be preferable to:
>
> if (a_good_variable_name->another_good_name
> && do_something_to_it(a_good_variable_name->another_good_name)) {
> // Do things
> }
I would personally prefer
if (a_good_variable_name->another_good_name &&
do_something_to_it(a_good_variable_name->another_good_name)) {
// Do things
}
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
