On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins <d...@nimblea.pe> wrote: > sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage package > maintainers to potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a > thing.... but as far as I'm concerned most package managers have out of > date versions of Asterisk, or don't have things you want so you end up > building from source anyway >
I actively package Asterisk for Fedora and EPEL (CentOS/RHEL), and I work hard to package the latest versions as they are released. I'm always open to additional input on how to make my packages more relevant for consumers -- either by packaging additional modules, or by having better sub-packages. For example, my packages already have chan_sip and pjsip split off as separate subpackages. -Jared
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
