On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Jared Smith <jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:50 AM Dan Jenkins <d...@nimblea.pe> wrote: > >> sorry, I thought I was agreeing with you :) we need to engage package >> maintainers to potentially help ease the shift - if packages are a >> thing.... but as far as I'm concerned most package managers have out of >> date versions of Asterisk, or don't have things you want so you end up >> building from source anyway >> > > I actively package Asterisk for Fedora and EPEL (CentOS/RHEL), and I work > hard to package the latest versions as they are released. I'm always open > to additional input on how to make my packages more relevant for consumers > -- either by packaging additional modules, or by having better > sub-packages. For example, my packages already have chan_sip and pjsip > split off as separate subpackages. > As a packager and someone who has been in the community and user world, what's your opinion and thoughts on the 2 year strategy? -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
