On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:
The thing to avoid is to write what has already been covered elsewhere. What
goes in asteriskdocs should be what is missing from A:TFoT.
I disagree. While it makes no sense to write what can be copied, I think
having a location to have as much as possible is the goal.
We are working on a cookbook for O'Reilly, which will not hit the shelves
for a while; so rest assured there is writing going on, just not here. I do
not have enough bandwidth to write more than I already am, but I would be
delighted to provide some editorial assistance. People probably don't
realize how an editor can fix up a lot of the stuff that makes people think
they can't write. If someone takes the time to write something, even if it
has poor grammar and spelling mistakes and would upset your English teacher,
it is no big deal. That can easily be fixed during the editing process.
Amen. Editors are needed.
One person I think we should try to rope in is Ira. He say he can't write
but from what I have seen I beg to differ ;-). Also, he has some good ideas
about what was missing from A:TFoT, which is exactly what we want to move
towards.
A section of all the asterisk functions, and neat stuff that can be done
with variables would be useful.
Have you actually looked at what I've done? It is there, just not as
filled out as I think it needs to be:
http://mph.gotdns.com:82/manual/en/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.purplecow.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-doc mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-doc
