This, is not the GUI's fault. It is coming in as 'teliax' instead of your username, therefore the gui cannot match it.
I would suggest using one of the service providers recommended, they all work. however, with a little tweaking, you could get this to work easily. -bk Trevor Benson wrote: > Here is the IAX2 debug information. > > > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00014ms SCall: 00253 DCall: 00000 [207.174.202.2:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : 800590xxxx > CODEC_PREFS : (g729|ulaw|g726|gsm) > CALLING NUMBER : 707570xxxx > CALLING PRESNTN : 0 > CALLING TYPEOFN : 0 > CALLING TRANSIT : 0 > CALLING NAME : A-1 NET SOLUTIO > LANGUAGE : en > USERNAME : teliax > FORMAT : 4 > CAPABILITY : 59654 > ADSICPE : 2 > DATE TIME : 2008-01-15 12:08:32 > > [Jan 15 11:13:44] NOTICE[4521]: chan_iax2.c:7344 socket_process: Rejected > connect attempt from 207.174.202.2, who was trying to reach '800590xxxx@' > Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00014ms SCall: 00002 DCall: 00253 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT > Timestamp: 00015ms SCall: 00002 DCall: 00253 [207.174.202.2:4569] > CAUSE : No authority found > CAUSE CODE : 50 > > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00015ms SCall: 00253 DCall: 00002 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00002ms SCall: 00425 DCall: 00000 [207.174.202.2:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : 800590xxxx > CODEC_PREFS : (g729|ulaw|g726|gsm) > CALLING NUMBER : 707570xxxx > CALLING PRESNTN : 0 > CALLING TYPEOFN : 0 > CALLING TRANSIT : 0 > CALLING NAME : A-1 NET SOLUTIO > LANGUAGE : en > USERNAME : teliax > FORMAT : 4 > CAPABILITY : 59654 > ADSICPE : 2 > DATE TIME : 2008-01-15 12:08:32 > > [Jan 15 11:13:44] NOTICE[4514]: chan_iax2.c:7344 socket_process: Rejected > connect attempt from 207.174.202.2, who was trying to reach '800590xxxx@' > Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00002ms SCall: 00003 DCall: 00425 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT > Timestamp: 00019ms SCall: 00003 DCall: 00425 [207.174.202.2:4569] > CAUSE : No authority found > CAUSE CODE : 50 > > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00019ms SCall: 00425 DCall: 00003 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00013ms SCall: 00598 DCall: 00000 [207.174.202.2:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : 800590xxxx > CODEC_PREFS : (g729|ulaw|g726|gsm) > CALLING NUMBER : 707570xxxx > CALLING PRESNTN : 0 > CALLING TYPEOFN : 0 > CALLING TRANSIT : 0 > CALLING NAME : A-1 NET SOLUTIO > LANGUAGE : en > USERNAME : teliax > FORMAT : 4 > CAPABILITY : 59654 > ADSICPE : 2 > DATE TIME : 2008-01-15 12:08:32 > > [Jan 15 11:13:44] NOTICE[4518]: chan_iax2.c:7344 socket_process: Rejected > connect attempt from 207.174.202.2, who was trying to reach '800590xxxx@' > Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00013ms SCall: 00004 DCall: 00598 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT > Timestamp: 00011ms SCall: 00004 DCall: 00598 [207.174.202.2:4569] > CAUSE : No authority found > CAUSE CODE : 50 > > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00011ms SCall: 00598 DCall: 00004 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW > Timestamp: 00013ms SCall: 00438 DCall: 00000 [207.174.202.2:4569] > VERSION : 2 > CALLED NUMBER : 800590xxxx > CODEC_PREFS : (g729|ulaw|g726|gsm) > CALLING NUMBER : 707570xxxx > CALLING PRESNTN : 0 > CALLING TYPEOFN : 0 > CALLING TRANSIT : 0 > CALLING NAME : A-1 NET SOLUTIO > LANGUAGE : en > USERNAME : teliax > FORMAT : 4 > CAPABILITY : 59654 > ADSICPE : 2 > DATE TIME : 2008-01-15 12:08:38 > > [Jan 15 11:13:50] NOTICE[4515]: chan_iax2.c:7344 socket_process: Rejected > connect attempt from 207.174.202.2, who was trying to reach '800590xxxx@' > Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00013ms SCall: 00005 DCall: 00438 [207.174.202.2:4569] > Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT > Timestamp: 00011ms SCall: 00005 DCall: 00438 [207.174.202.2:4569] > CAUSE : No authority found > CAUSE CODE : 50 > > Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK > Timestamp: 00011ms SCall: 00438 DCall: 00005 [207.174.202.2:4569] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-gui- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bkruse >> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:23 AM >> To: Asterisk GUI project discussion >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] IAX and SIP >> >> >> The problem chan_iax is giving you, is an error because >> that user is calling in as a guest (because the context is configured >> out by the user entry) >> >> eg (trimmed) >> [6001] >> context=blah >> >> Then calls come into [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> I need iax2 debug so I can see why the registration is failing. >> >> -bk >> >> Trevor Benson wrote: >> >>> Having a few issues in Custom voip with SNV Revision: 2131. When >>> >> inbound SIP calls come in I get a "Failed to authenticate user "A-1 NET >> SOLUTIO" <sip:xxxxxxxx" well thats the Caller ID from teliax being sent >> along. Not really used to setting users.conf manually so not sure what >> it could be, as it seems self explanatory compared to the old sip.conf, >> and i dont see anything obviously wrong. >> >>> IAX gives me the error chan_iax2.c:7344 socket_process: Rejected >>> >> connect attempt from 207.174.202.2, who was trying to reach >> '8005551234@' (number replaced for mailing list) but nothing after the >> @. If I set inbound rules for ANY unrecognized AND the actual number >> from this provider to route somewhere, it still says rejecting connect >> attempt. >> >>> Willing to debug, but want to bring up the line as well so I will >>> >> place it into the system the old way by hand if need be. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Trevor >>> >>> PS. This is a client that is so gungho about the asterisk-gui and >>> >> they just want it in production in beta anyway. We can pretty much do >> any direct conf editing to resolve problems, but otherwise I wouldn't >> be worried about connecting this line and getting it working. >> >>> Thanks >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >>> >>> asterisk-gui mailing list >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >> >> asterisk-gui mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui >> > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
