> _+17077731234 or +17077731234 they both say unmatched extensions. I Try another rule with _17077731234 , see if it works.
-Pari -- Pari Nannapaneni Digium, Inc. | Software Developer. 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Benson" <[email protected]> To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 12:16:47 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: [asterisk-gui] Service Providers and Incoming Calling Rules Does anyone using GUI 2.x have bandwidth.com routing properly into their system? I created a blanket rule that all unmatched extensions will go to which matches and then gets answered, but no matter if I use _+17077731234 or +17077731234 they both say unmatched extensions. I have removed the service provider and rules, and replaced them. Can someone who has the extension actually matching correctly show me their service provider edit page (no user and password so shouldn't be a security issue) and the inbound calling rule (preferably as it shows in the GUI and an output of how it shows from extensions.conf. Either its a pattern match issue with the + involved, or there is some context inheritance issue, is about all i can figure at this point. I would really appreciate any response from someone who knows their dialplans with BW.com is working. Thank you, Trevor Benson A1 Networks _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
