> Any thoughts ? Any change of being able to specify a Local Destination as a
> pattern in the future ?

Done! check out r4364.
You should now have a 'custom' option in the 'local destinations' select box.

>From what i understand you should be also able to do what you want
by editing the default 'macro-pagingintercom' definition in pbx.js

-Pari

-- 
Pari Nannapaneni
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer.
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Byer Jr." <[email protected]>
To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:44:38 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [asterisk-gui] How can I...

Greetings,


I'm looking to set up an intercom facility between {3 digit} extensions.

My plan has been to send the call to something like _9XXX, pattern match on
the leading 9, strip it, add a SIP header indicating auto-answer, and then
dial the real extension.

I set out to create that calling rule in the GUI, and got stuck on the need
to specify a specific local Destination, rather than maintain the pattern
match (i.e. XXX).  I'm looking to be able to do this to a number of
extension (>50) such that doing them individually would be onerous indeed. 

Any thoughts ? Any change of being able to specify a Local Destination as a
pattern in the future ?

Thanks,

Ron


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Benson
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:17 PM
To: Asterisk GUI project discussion
Subject: [asterisk-gui] Service Providers and Incoming Calling Rules

Does anyone using GUI 2.x have bandwidth.com routing properly into their 
system?  I created a blanket rule that all unmatched extensions will go 
to which matches and then gets answered, but no matter if I use 
_+17077731234 or +17077731234 they both say unmatched extensions.  I 
have removed the service provider and rules, and replaced them. 

Can someone who has the extension actually matching correctly show me 
their service provider edit page (no user and password so shouldn't be a 
security issue) and the inbound calling rule (preferably as it shows in 
the GUI and an output of how it shows from extensions.conf.


Either its a pattern match issue with the + involved, or there is some 
context inheritance issue, is about all i can figure at this point.  I 
would really appreciate any response from someone who knows their 
dialplans with BW.com is working.

Thank you,
Trevor Benson
A1 Networks

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-gui mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1850 - Release Date: 12/15/2008
5:04 PM
 


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-gui mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-gui mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui

Reply via email to