On 08/30/2010 09:39 AM, Paul Albrecht wrote: > I have a question about asterisk transcoding from wide slinear to ulaw > (or alaw or g729). Specifically, the result I get when I translate from > AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR16 to AST_FORMAT_ULAW is truncated, that is, I don't > get a 160 samples in the output frame. Is this a bug or should I have > expected the translator to truncate the result?
How many samples were in the input frame? Is there a smoother involved? -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-security mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-security
