On 08/31/2010 01:17 PM, Paul Albrecht wrote: > The only time I got a different result was once after I recompiled > asterisk. Now every time I have run the program I get the same result. I > think the frame is set up correctly. You can check the code fragment I > use to initialize the input frame I sent in a previous post. Lastly, I > always use the same input frame for translation which is not consumed on > the call to the translator.
static struct ast_frame f; static unsigned char data[AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET + 640]; f.data.ptr = (void *)(data + AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET); f.frametype = AST_FRAME_VOICE; f.subclass = AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR16; f.samples = 320; f.offset = AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET; f.datalen = 640; ======== If these 'static' variables are at module scope (outside of any function), then this is OK for the first time you call the translator, as the ast_frame and the data array will be initialized to zeroes. If these variables are in a function, then they may not be initialized to any predictable value at all. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-security mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-security
