Well at least we don't have Janet Reno sending tanks in on civilians anymore.
Regards MIKE On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 11:59, Steven Critchfield wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 10:44, Florian Overkamp wrote: > > At 10:20 6-3-2003 -0600, you wrote: > > >On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 04:25, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote: > > > > the license is needed only with cisco > > > > callmanager. so you can ignore it and use > > > > both ports with asterisk ;-) > > > > > >Thats wrong according to the debates here and on the FWD mailing list. > > >The unit that Michiel was looking at contains software that connects to > > >the Cisco Call Manager, probably using skinney. What Michiel needs is > > >one with the SIP or H323 software load on it. The units with SIP or > > >H323 loaded on it usually have the license for both ports to use that > > >software. > > > > Incorrect. The load that includes Skinny protocol also speaks MGCP, which > > is perfectly useable with Asterisk. Besides, as I understand it Cisco won't > > care that much if you load it up with the SIP/H323 stack either. But no-one > > will confirm that officially ofcourse. > > So to keep this from dragging out like the rest of the threads about > this have. > > While they may not prosecute an individual for having loaded an > unlicensed stack on the hardware, it is unwise to suggest it in a > publicly available and archived list. Do remember here in the US we have > to now worry more about John Ashcroft than the company whose software we > use/abuse since John can bring charges on his own without the company. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
