Before you prepend the "I", does IAX2 really depend on IP? For example couldn't you send TASTE over ATM, FDDI, X25 or a simple serial cable? My bet is that most VoIP would work better if it weren't for the IP part. Yes I do have use for other transports.
--- John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in favor of "TASTE" myself, though Mark's take on "LIVE" has the > > all-important "I", to establish the use of this protocol over IP > networks, which is an important part of the protocol and conceptual > structure, yes? > > Perhaps "ITASTE" with the "I" standing for the obvious "Internet". > > JT > > > >What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > > >Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > > >"TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to > "SIP". > >Is it took hoaky? > > > >Mark > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
