On Wednesday 10 September 2003 14:32, Chris Albertson wrote: > > >Read the security vulnerability. It referenced CVS > > > > as of a certain > > > > >date. If you aren't keeping up with CVS changes, > > > > why are you running > > > > >CVS at all? > > One would hope people are not using the latest CVS > checkup as their production system. Most sane people > do a bit better quality control and testing then that > on a misson critical system. So fielded systems are > likely to be a bit in back of CVS.
Odd, I've found CVS-current to be extremely stable, so I run it on all of our production machines. No machine is ever more than a couple weeks out of sync with CVS (except for a few machines in the field which I can't get to right now). -Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
