On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:00:04AM +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote: > Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > >Zoltan Szecsei wrote: > > > >>I've traced the problem to be with the firewall and the fact that I > >>have 2 NICs in the box. Now that I have opened port 4569 on both > >>interfaces, asterisk seems happy *but* does anyone know how to force > >>SuSE 9.3 to always bring up a specific NIC before the otherone? > > > > > >SUSE Pro 9.3 assigns IP addresses to NICs based on their MAC > >addresses, not their slot positions or load order (unless you've done > >something funky). You should not have any problem with the wrong NIC > >getting a particular IP address, and Asterisk does not care at all > >which one is 'eth0'. > > I wish this were true, but, believe me, on reboot, sometime the pci 3com > card gets eth0 and sometime the onboard. Who says computers re-iterate > perfectly :-) ? > > BTW: I need the pci card to be eth0 (sensed first).
If you want useful answers from people here, provide some data for people to work with. As for that data: people asked you to look at some specific files. E.g: frankly I still can't tell if both cards get loaded by the same module or by different modules. Frankly, I can't think of a good reason why two different boots of the same machine with very similar config would have different module/card load order. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
