Lee Howard wrote:
Go ahead and have a proprietary fork, sell it, have it specially licensed. But please, please, please treat the community fairly. Otherwise it causes unrest in the community, discourages contribution, encourages forking, and triggers forum threads like this one.
You seem to be neglecting the amount of work that Digium puts into the Asterisk (and related) products on an ongoing basis that is given to the community at no charge. Saying "Digium GPLed Asterisk and we're thankful for that, now what" only makes sense if it happened one time and then Digium stopped contributing to the source base.
I think the situation is much different from that (although I'm obviously biased since I'm paid to work full-time on Asterisk by Digium). Digium continues to pay people to provide enhancements to Asterisk, Zaptel and the related projects, and those enhancements are even used by companies that directly compete with Digium. We also very strongly push our "custom development" customers in the direction of letting us include the code we write for them into the open-source tree, so that the community will benefit.
In other words, I think the contributions from Digium to the community are ongoing, and in many ways more than offset the license that contributors grant to us for the commercial use of their code in our products. Your opinion may vary, of course :-)
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
