Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: > Sean Rima wrote: >> Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: >>> Sean Rima wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one >>>> and am >>>> thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and >>>> just >>>> ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting >>>> phones onto the asterisk box >>> >>> No, you would ignore the LAN port. When I am at home I use this setup: >>> >>> Phones -> 2100 FXS ports -> 2100 WAN port -> Ethernet Switch -> Asterisk >> >> If I were to get another 2100 would I use the LAN port to connect to it? > > You would only use the LAN port if you wanted the device to provide NAT > translation/routing between the LAN port and the WAN port. >
Ahh ok, will get a bigger switch in time then Sean -- +----------------------------------------------------+ |VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie | |GPG Key: http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
