> >>Personally, I could care less which O/S the stuff runs on as long as > >>it runs reliably, and the sys admin understands how to manage whatever > >>sytem he/she is responsible for. > >> > > > >Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several > >Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so). There is definately a > >time and place for Windows.. I'm just not sure a real-time-VoIP server > >is the time or place. Being semi-half serious about the GUI there > >also. You install X on your Asterisk server and things will not be > >happy either. > > > > > An effective DOS attack on a $300,000 Alpha running NT I used to use was > "wiggle the mouse" :-) I never really understood how that brought a > multi-CPU machine to a standstill, but it did.
Yup, and so does one incorrect statement in zapata.conf. ;) Both probably resulted from some untested/unexpected activity the developer never addressed for whatever reason. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
