just as an (bad) example: we are using an x206 and couldn't get the zttest above 99.975 equal what we were doing single irq, w/o acpi, w/o apic, different kernels, w/o hyperthreading, different slots, a.s.o. for an Digium wildcard TE110P
so if someone got such a board to zttest 100% maybe could give some information if where's something special to run asterisk on such boards... otherwise I think there are production differences on the ibm-mainboards or the used chipsets we'll change hardware next... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29.09.2005 18:35:03: > This might seem a silly question but, what is the true meaning of the numbers zttest spits out? > On 9/29/05, Marco Supino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > My TDM is on its own IRQ, and the x306 has only one full-size PCI slot.. > so no playing with it, > > what results do you get from zttest ? what IRQ is the card on ? > > Marco. > > > Damian Funnell wrote: > > Have you checked that the TDM400P isn't sharing an IRQ with anything > > else? Don't trust /proc/interrupts - run lspci -v to confirm this. > > > > We have * running on an x206 and found that the only way to stop the > > TDP400P sharing an IRQ with other devices was to juggle cards between > > slots. > > > > Hope this helps! > > Damian. > > > > > > Marco Supino wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to know what type of configuration could get me closer to > >> 100% hits in zttest, when testing a TDM400P with 4 FXO ports, > >> > >> I am currently running kernel 2.4.31, on a IBM Xseries 306, with 3gh > >> CPU, HT is disabled, PCI latency was changed, i still cant get more > >> then 99.975% in the zttest testings, > >> > >> Thanks for any info. > >> > >> Marco. > >> _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users