I would imagine that it would boil down to the niceties of having one source tree for the core product, regardless of license chosen?
Just a guess. Matt Hardeman PaperSoft -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help with GPL license of Asterisk I would also like some more info on this whole mysql being taken out of the core asterisk install. I understand its because of the dual lic. that digium has.. gpl and comercial... why can't mysql be non-existant in the comercial version. Then mysql would be compatible with asterisk?!? Or am I wrong about this... Because I don't recall Open Source software having this much drama. bkw On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Mark Spencer wrote: > > > > 2) if you build your application as a module that loads into a stock > > > > asterisk server, you do not have to disclose your source > > > This is FALSE. Even modules for Asterisk MUST be released under GPL, > > > unless you obtain a license to release them outside of GPL from Digium. > > > > Just to be on the safe side: What if the module is not released publically but > > is used in production systems internally? > > Still okay. GPL only relates to distribution not to use. As long as you > are not distributing your changes, its requirements will not affect you. > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
