> Interesting. The GPL is more parasitic than I had originally thought.
Yes. > I was unaware of the 'Linux Exception,' as I'm not a developer, but I > was thinking about how some companies do release binary only modules for > the Linux kernel, and wrongly assumed that this was provided for in the > GPL. Yes. Also, the LGPL license does permit linking with proprietary code dynamically, so binary only modules would be fine. > All I can say, is sorry if I mislead anyone, and thank God I'm not a > software developer and don't have to deal with this evil, evil license. No problem, it's easy to get confused :) I would, however, take issue with the GPL being "evil". It's not my *ideal* license, but it certainly is good enough. Mark _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
