On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:43:34 +0100 WipeOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thats COOL!!!. :)
Is GPL the correct licence for it??
I am not so hot on all that licencing stuff and all I hear is that licence X is not compatible with licence Y and so this code needs to removed and yada-yada-yada blah-blah-blah..
Would it not be better to use LGPL (which I believe is less restrictive) or X11/MIT Licence which has very few limitations as I see it..
Later..
GPL should be sufficient. I went over it during my lunch break. Seems like the users have more rights than the Authors. :) Basically what it comes down to is that anyone can use/modify it in any way, as long as they release it GPL as well. I found it to be quite lax on restrictions for use/distribution to be honest.
It also means that if it's modified, I can't be blamed for anything, which is all I'm worried about. Given that it is a separate entity to Asterisk, it should not use LGPL as it is not a library.
J
Regards,
Jamie Carl Jazz Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.jazz-inc.net Phone: +61-414-365-466 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
