On Tue, November 15, 2005 18:34, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC said: > If you prefer the capabilities of the gui, I'd recommend against > wordpad. You don't want (can't have?) the wrong line termination chars > in there. > > I have found crimson editor to be quick-loading and easy to use - > www.crimsoneditor.com - small memory footprint. > > Conversely, I often use nano for very minor .conf editing. It's Ctrl-K > and Ctrl-U functions are fairly easy ways to copy blocks of text around > a file. And if you open two terminals, with nano in each, you could of > course copy-n-paste between windows with your mouse. > > Moj >
Yay! The editor war has started! ;-p But seriously, I primarily use vi. Using the keys is really fast, and as with any browser, once you have the shortcuts down, it's easy... cut (yy), paste (p), search and replace (:%s//), switching files (:n :N :w, etc.), it's all quite easy and fast... But neither nano nor vi are Windows GUI editors, which Wordpad is... :-D -- Francesco Peeters ---- GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
